Friday, February 20, 2015

Film Review: "House of Saddam," directed by Alex Holmes and Jim O'Hanlon, 2014.



House of Saddam. Directed by Alex Holmes and Jim O'Hanlon, writer, Stephen Butchard, featuring Igal Naor, Shohreh Aghdashloo, Amr Waked (HBO Films in association with BBC, HBO, 2008), Streaming (Amazon Prime Streaming, 2014).


House of Saddam provides the viewer a docudrama with a healthy mix of suspense, action, and emotional turmoil that surrounds the near 25 year regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The total series is split into four parts, each focusing on a specific year in his life.

Part One: 1979 showcases his coup over then Iraqi President Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr and his rise to president.

Part Two: 1988-1991 reveals a few of the origins of Iraq's war with Iran, as well as Saddam's eldest son Uday's increasingly erratic behavior as the son of a dictator. We also see Saddam meet personally with US ambassador April Glaspie, whose carefully diplomatic statement of "no opinion" on the regional conflicts between Kuwait and Iraq provides Saddam with an opening to initiate hot war for economic disagreements.

Part Three: 1995 sees Iraq's economy in disarray, between the disastrous Gulf War and UN sanctions, as Saddam's attention focuses on establishing a familial tie to the Prophet Muhammad. Even as his eldest son's behavior becomes increasingly troubled and UN Inspector Rolf Ekeus takes a hardline approach to his work, Saddam's own inner circle of trusted advisors begin questioning his ability to lead.

Part Four: 2003 Charts the US-led invasion of Iraq under President George W. Bush. Saddam's hold on power continues to decline as the economy and military abilities of Iraq cripple under the superior resources of the coalition forces. Saddam is forced to go into hiding as his sons face an American siege. The film ends with Saddam's 2006 trial for crimes against humanity.

Overall, this series of films provides a satisfying look into the Machiavellian ideology Saddam Hussein brings with him as he gains and holds power in Iraq. Any film with a controversial figure as its subject demands a team that carefully balances the political with the economic and the human. These films do not adequately showcase the political interplay between the international community and Saddam's Iraq, particularly the various cooperative agreements between the West and Iraq when it suited the former. The human aspects of the regime are displayed well, however it might have strengthened the film to explore what little is known of Saddam's upbringing.

Saddam's adherence to gaining and maintaining power through intimidation and fear shows what happens under such regimes. The sheer ignorance of what his people experienced under his control, either through blindness or a lack of care, is displayed alongside his other brutal ways of maintaining power. This film is a testiment to the lead actor Yigal Naor's abilities, as he captures the dictator's mannerisms and emotional displays well. The supporting cast also provide a strong accompaniment to bringing this interesting story to life.

Historians will cringe at the lack of depth, but viewers would be well suited to see this series as a new glimpse into the lives of a thoroughly propagandized figure. The team focused on research and accuracy to the best degree they could. Alex Holmes states:

"We set out to talk to as many people as we could who had known Saddam first-hand in order to piece together a picture of what life was like inside Saddam's ever-shrinking inner circle. We spoke to his allies and to his adversaries; to politicians, exiles, palace insiders, his cooks, his menservants, friends of the Hussein family and government ministers. We interviewed people inside and outside Iraq.

"We cross-referenced these interviews with pictures and home movies left behind by the Hussein family, some produced for propaganda purposes, but others more candid, salvaged from the regime's destroyed palaces. And we accessed the partial trail of documents that emerged following the fall of the secretive and obsessively bureaucratic regime. The process took three years and involved a team of three researchers, all Arabic speakers. What emerges is a distinct and independent portrait of a dictator and his center of power."

The paper trail is impressive, and provides strong support for what is displayed. It is a welcome addition to the variety of films seeking insight into shadowy, controversial figures that impacted nations.

Recommended Films: W.; The Hurricane, Man on the Moon; Ray; Ali

No comments:

Post a Comment